{"id":8881,"date":"2018-05-05T12:34:17","date_gmt":"2018-05-05T12:34:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.claude-arnaud.com\/fr\/?page_id=8881"},"modified":"2024-08-12T16:21:13","modified_gmt":"2024-08-12T15:21:13","slug":"chamfort-dans-les-pays-anglo-saxon-chamfort-in-english","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.claude-arnaud.com\/fr\/biographies\/chamfort\/chamfort-dans-les-pays-anglo-saxon-chamfort-in-english","title":{"rendered":"Chamfort : in english\/ dans les pays anglo-saxons"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\n\n\n\n\n
\n
\u00a0(LA TRADUCTION EN FRAN\u00c7AIS<\/span> DES ARTICLES SE trouve DANS LA SECONDE MOITI\u00c9 DE CETTE PAGE<\/span>)<\/strong><\/h6>\n<\/td>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
\"\"<\/a>\"\"*Translated by<\/strong> Deke Dusinberre<\/strong><\/span>, and published in 1992 by the University of Chicago Press<\/strong>, with a Foreword by Joseph Epstein<\/strong><\/span>, thE biography of CHAMFORT<\/strong> by CLAUDE ARNAUD was widely applauded<\/strong>, both in the USA and the UK. ISBN 0-226-02697-3. (The Epstein<\/strong>\u2019s foreword was first published in the Special anniversary issue of The New Criterion<\/em><\/span><\/strong>, Vol 10, N\u00b01).<\/h6>\n
\"\"<\/a>*\u00ab This sweeping study<\/span> explores the life and times of the self-invented and self-destroyed wit<\/span>,<\/strong> philosopher, an playwright Chamfort<\/strong> (1740-1794), whose aphoristic style and enigmatic personality influenced, among others, Nietzsche<\/strong> and<\/strong><\/span> Camus<\/strong> \u00bb. Kirkus Review<\/strong><\/em>, 1.03. 1992. read this article\u2026 <\/a><\/h6>\n
\"\"<\/a>*\u00ab Vivid and fascinating<\/strong> \u00bb. P.N.FURBANK<\/strong><\/span>, The New York Review of Books<\/em><\/strong>, 25.06.1992. read the article of R.N. Furbank, A double life, in THE New York review of books<\/em>, vol. 39, n\u00b012, june 25 1992<\/strong> : www.nybooks.com<\/a>.<\/h6>\n
*read another review<\/span><\/strong> about the english translaton of this biography, in the NYRB<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/a>\u2026<\/h6>\n
*\u00ab This book is more than a biography.<\/span> It is an extensively researched intellectual history of that period in France which affected all the world<\/span><\/strong> \u2013 the last of the \u00ab Ancien Regime \u00bb and the French Revolution that followed \u00bb. R.M. SEATON<\/strong><\/span>, Alliance Time Herald<\/em><\/strong>, Manhattan Mercury\u2026,17 and 18.07.1992.\"\"<\/a><\/h6>\n
\"\"<\/a>*\u00ab (A) sound, thorough and well-researched biography<\/strong><\/span> (\u2026) a lively and highly entertaining book<\/strong> \u00bb. Olivier BERNIER<\/span><\/strong>, The Wall Street Journal<\/strong><\/em>, 19.06.1992.<\/h6>\n
*\u00ab More so than many of the brillant men and women<\/span> populating French intellectual life in the second half of the 18th century<\/strong>, Chamfort<\/strong><\/span> was in need of a modern biography that Mr<\/strong>. ARNAUD<\/strong><\/span>, searchingly yet not inhumanly has given us \u00bb. Colin WALTERS<\/strong><\/span>, The Washington Times<\/strong><\/em>, 24.06.1992.\"\"<\/a><\/h6>\n
\"\"<\/a>*\u00ab\u2026Claude Arnaud<\/strong> has succeeded in writing an acid, sceptical biography.<\/strong><\/span> The enigma of this profound man has not been solved \u2013 it cannot be \u2013 but by means of contradictory little touches<\/strong><\/span> (which the english translation faithfully renders), it has been fully stated. With a remarkable economy of means, the thread of this rather absurd life has been inserted into a tissue<\/span> \u2013 at least as absurd \u2013 of events<\/strong>, of reversals of opinion, of political backlashes, which Chamfort<\/strong> may have thought he could help to control but which were finally to much for him. Arnaud is an excellent<\/span> observer<\/span> of present-day Parisian society, an excellent reader<\/span> of the French m\u00e9morialists and moralists, and he has put all his human and litterary experience<\/span> into an acute and even cruel understanding of this incomplete, tormented, suicidal man of the world<\/span>.<\/strong> With a skill that professional historians might well envy, he has evoked the terrifying strangeness of the revolutionary<\/strong> years in Paris<\/strong>\u00bb. Marc FUMAROLI<\/strong><\/span>, The Times Literary Supplement<\/em><\/strong>, 12.06.1992.\"\"<\/a>\"\"<\/a><\/h6>\n
*\u00ab\u00a0I was so blank on Chamfort that<\/strong> I had read my way more than a hundred pages into this book before I could allay suspicion that there had been no such perso<\/span>n and that Arnaud\u2019s<\/span> work was in fact a devilishly clever documentary novel<\/span>.<\/strong> It seemed possible that Chamfort had been invented<\/strong><\/span> in order to bring into sharper relief the outlines of \u2018real\u2019 people<\/span> like Mirabeau, Condorcet<\/span>, the Rolands or even Robespierre<\/strong>. Chamfort seemed to correspond more to the shape of the space between famous people than to a personality in his own right\u00a0\u00bb, one can read in \u00ab\u00a0Revolutionary Chic\u00a0\u00bb, WRITES Neal Ascherson\u2019s<\/strong> IN THE LONDON REVIEW OF BOOKS\u2026\u00a0\u00bbClaude Arnaud<\/strong><\/span>\u2019s rapid, richly-detailed, gossiping and name-dropping biography\"\"<\/a> turns out to be one of the most instructive<\/span> of all histories about what revolution feels like and how its heat can suddenly and repeatedly transform personalities until they are unrecognisable<\/span><\/strong>. Those who retain consistency, even in the heart of the furnace, are often those who are already social chameleons and masters of the skills of multiple identity<\/span>.<\/strong> Revolutionary chic began with Chamfort<\/span>.\u00a0\u00bb READ THE ENTIRE AESCHERSON\u2019<\/span>S recension in the London Review of Books<\/strong><\/em> (vol. 14, n\u00b0 21, 5 Nov 1992)\u2026<\/a>
<\/strong><\/h6>\n
*\u00ab Arnaud\u2019s<\/span> biography<\/strong> is a usefull introduction to an aphorist who deserve a place alongside La Rochefoucauld<\/span><\/strong> and a historical figure from whom Mirabeau<\/strong> stole many of his best lines \u00bb, writes John RUICSHANK<\/strong><\/span>, in the Toronto Globe and Mail review of books<\/em><\/strong>, 11.07.1992.<\/h6>\n
\"\"<\/a>*\u00ab Mr. Arnaud<\/strong><\/span> tells Chamfort<\/strong>\u2019s story with conviction<\/strong>.<\/span> He rounds out his material in a sweeping style<\/strong> <\/span>that is occasionally rather high-handed, occasionally academic (\u2026) No study could answer all the questions about Chamfort<\/strong><\/span> but this one presents us at last with a full and suggestive portrait (\u2026) \u2013 a contradictory, agonized, elusive, defiant, childishly egotistical,<\/span> sometimes plain silly, sometimes repellent and sometimes dazzling and admirable figure<\/span><\/strong> \u00bb. W.S. MERWIN<\/strong>, The New York Times Book Review<\/em><\/strong>, 9.08.1992.\"\"<\/a><\/h6>\n
*\u00ab\u2026This book<\/strong><\/span> (\u2026) enjoyable and profitable<\/strong><\/span>\u2026brings the reader close to a country and an era which seem to have lost none of their fascination (\u2026) Indeed, the book succeeds quite brillantly at times in evoking the last few decades of the ancien r\u00e9gime<\/span><\/strong>, and the dramatic and colorful story of the French Revolution.\u00bb George MAY<\/strong>, The Yale Review<\/em><\/strong>, October 1992, n\u00b04.<\/h6>\n
*\u00a0\u00bbIn Claude Arnaud\u2019s<\/strong> <\/span>captivating biography, Chamfort the libertine<\/strong>, playwright, journalist, and revolutionary stands revealed as the most telling emblem of his times<\/span><\/strong>\u00ab\u00a0, one can read on GOODREADS<\/em> website<\/strong>. See the ratings<\/a>\u2026<\/h6>\n
*\u00ab A BOOK TO MEDITATE ON A LIFELONG<\/span><\/strong> \u00bb Georges D. PAINTER<\/strong>, letter to the author, 1989<\/strong>.<\/h6>\n
*find this book<\/strong>::<\/a> www.amazon.fr<\/a><\/h6>\n
In France : abebooks.fr<\/a><\/h6>\n
*THE TRANSLATOR\u2019S POINT OF VIEW:<\/strong><\/h6>\n
\u00ab\u00a0I most enjoyed the very first book I did for a university press (Chicago), twenty-odd years ago. It was Claude Arnaud\u2019s<\/strong> <\/span>biography of the eighteenth-century French aphorist Chamfort. I was delighted to have a book contract, the text itself was elegantly written<\/strong>, Chamfort\u2019s aphoristic quips were challenging to translate, and Claude Arnaud<\/strong><\/span> was encouraging and helpful. It was a most rewarding experience that convinced to continue down this path. I\u2019m still very proud of that nearly flawless translation<\/span>,<\/strong> even though it was slammed in a major literary review\u2014which, as painful as that experience was, taught me to look beyond petty one-upmanship to the underlying substance of translation (most translations are better than reviewers think\u2014when they bother to think about it<\/strong>). <\/strong>Deke DUSINBERR<\/strong>E<\/strong><\/span>, 22\/08\/2013<\/strong>. To read more\u2026<\/a><\/h6>\n
\"\"<\/a>*GET THAT<\/strong> BIOGRAPHY IN SWEDEN<\/a>…\u00a0<\/span><\/h6>\n

******************************************************************************************************************************<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>*Publi\u00e9 aux Presses Universitaires de Chicago<\/strong><\/span>, en mai 1992, dans une traduction anglaise de Deke Dusinberre<\/strong>,<\/span> et avec un avant-propos de Joseph Epstein<\/strong>, CHAMFORT<\/strong><\/em><\/span> a re\u00e7u un accueil\"\"<\/a> enthousiaste aux Etats-Unis et en Angleterre.)<\/h6>\n
\"\"<\/a>*\u00abCEt ample ouvrage<\/span> eXPLORE la vie et l’\u00e9poque du philosophe et auteur dramatique <\/strong>\u00a0CHAMFORT<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0(1740-1794), cet esprit auto-invent\u00e9 et autodestructeur<\/span><\/strong>, dont la aphorismes et la personalit\u00e9 engimatique ont influenc\u00e9, entre autres,\u00a0NIETZSCHE<\/strong>\u00a0AND<\/strong>\u00a0CAMUS<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0\u00bb, lit-on dans la\u00a0KIRKUS REVIEW <\/strong><\/em>\u00a0du 1\u00b0 mars 1992.\u00a0pour lire cet ARTICLE\u2026<\/a><\/h6>\n
\"\"<\/a>*\u00ab Frappant<\/span>, fASCINAnt<\/strong>\u00a0\u00bb. \u00e9crit\u00a0P.N.FURBANK<\/strong><\/span>, dans\u00a0THE NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS<\/em><\/strong>, 25.06.1992. lire cet ARTICLE: A DOUBLE LIFE, publi\u00e9 dans la\u00a0NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS<\/em>, VOL. 39, N\u00b012, JUNE 25 1992<\/strong>\u00a0:\u00a0WWW.NYBOOKS.COM<\/a>.<\/h6>\n
*lire un autre article<\/span> a propos <\/strong>de la\u00a0\u00a0TRAductiON de cette BIOGRAPHie, toujours dans la\u00a0NYRB<\/strong><\/em><\/a>\u2026<\/h6>\n
*\u00ab Ce livre est plus qu’une\u00a0BIOGRAPHIe. C’est aussi une histoire INTELLECTUelle,<\/span> tr\u00e8s pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment document\u00e9e, de cette p\u00e9riode de l’histoire de FRANCE qui AFFECTa le monde<\/span><\/strong>\u00a0\u2013 les derniers temps de l’\u00ab ANCIEN REGIME \u00bb et les premiers de la REVOLUTION fran\u00e7aise \u00bb, \u00e9crit\u00a0R.M. SEATON<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0dans l’ALLIANCE TIME HERALD<\/em><\/strong>, MANHATTAN MERCURY\u2026,dat\u00e9 du 17 et 18 juillet 1992.\"\"<\/a><\/h6>\n
\"\"<\/a>*\u00ab une BIOGRAPHie rigoureuse<\/span>, intelligente et exhaustive<\/span><\/strong>\u00a0(\u2026) un ouvrage vivant et plus qu’excitant<\/span><\/strong>\u00a0\u00bb, pr\u00e9cise\u00a0OLIVIER BERNIER dans<\/strong>\u00a0THE WALL STREET JOURNA<\/span>L<\/strong><\/em>, en date du 19.06.1992.<\/h6>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
*\u00ab un ouvrage qu\u2019il faudrait m\u00e9diter longtemps<\/span>, pour le reste de sa vie<\/strong>. \u00bb LETTRE DE GEORGES D. PAINTER, biographe de Proust<\/span>,<\/span> A L\u2019AUTEUR, 1989.<\/strong><\/h6>\n
*\u00ab plus que tant d’esprits bRILLANTs<\/span> qui s’illustr\u00e8rent dans la \u00a0vie intellectuelle fran\u00e7aise de la seconde partie du 18\u00b0 si\u00e8cle<\/span><\/strong>,\u00a0CHAMFORT<\/strong>\u00a0manquait d’une biographie que\u00a0MR<\/strong>.\u00a0ARNAUD<\/strong><\/span>, avec obstination mais non sans humanit\u00e9, vient de nous offrir<\/strong> \u00bb, \u00e9crit\u00a0COLIN WALTERS<\/span> dans<\/strong>\u00a0THE WASHINGTON TIMES<\/strong><\/em>, 24.06.1992.\"\"<\/a><\/h6>\n
\"\"<\/a>*\u00ab\u2026la biographie tonique et sceptique<\/span> de cLAUDE ARNAUD<\/strong>\u00a0 est une r\u00e9ussite.<\/strong>\u00a0l’\u00e9nigme <\/strong><\/span>de cet esprit profond persiste \u2013 Il ne pouvait en \u00eatre autrement<\/span><\/strong> \u2013 mais elle est parfaitement rendue\u00a0par\u00a0 des petites touches\u00a0<\/strong>CONTRADICToirES<\/strong>\u00a0(que la traduction anglaise rend fid\u00e8lement).\u00a0Avec une REMARquABLE ECONOMie de moyens,<\/span> le fil de cette vie presque ABSURDe<\/span> se voit ins\u00e9rer dans un TISSU \u2013 largement aussi ABSURDe<\/span> \u2013 d’\u00e9v\u00e8nements<\/strong>, d’OPINIONs changeantes<\/span>, de conflits POLITIques<\/strong>, que\u00a0CHAMFORT<\/strong>\u00a0crut pouvoir CONTR\u00f4Ler<\/strong> mais qui s’av\u00e9r\u00e8rent bien trop forts<\/strong> pour lui.\u00a0ARNAUD<\/span> est non seulement un EXCELLENT\u00a0OBSERVateur<\/span> de l’actuel soci\u00e9t\u00e9 PARISIenne, mais il est aussi un EXCELLENT lecteur des M\u00c9MORIALISTeS<\/span> fran\u00e7ais et des MORALISTeS,<\/span> et il a investi toute son exp\u00e9rience HUMAiNe et LITTEraire<\/span> dans cette interpr\u00e9tation aigue et souvent cruelle<\/span> de cet homme du monde INCOMPLET, Tourment\u00e9 et SUICIDAire<\/span>.<\/strong>\u00a0avec une adresse que des historiens professionnels pourraient lui envier<\/span>, il a su rendre la\u00a0TERRIfiante<\/span> \u00e9tranget\u00e9 de la p\u00e9riode R\u00e9VOLUTIONAire<\/span> \u00e0<\/strong>\u00a0PARIS<\/strong>\u00bb.\u00a0MARC FUMAROLI<\/span><\/strong>,\u00a0THE TIMES LITERARY SUPPLEMENT<\/em><\/strong>, 12.06.1992.<\/h6>\n
.\"\"<\/a>\"\"<\/a><\/h6>\n
\u00a0<\/h6>\n
*\u00ab\u00a0J’\u00e9tais si ignorant\u00a0de chamfort<\/span>\u00a0que j’ai pu\u00a0SOUP\u00c7ONNER<\/strong>, apr\u00e8s avoir lu une centaine de pages de ce livre,<\/span>\u00a0que jamais\u00a0n’avait <\/strong> exist\u00e9 une personne r\u00e9pondant \u00e0 ce nom<\/span> et que l’ouvrage d’<\/strong>ARNAUD<\/span> \u00e9tait en fait un \u00a0roman<\/span> d\u00e9guis\u00e9 en un DOCUMENTAire d’une intelligence diabolique.<\/span>\u00a0Il me semblait tout \u00e0 fait possible que<\/strong> CHAMFORT<\/strong><\/span> ait \u00e9t\u00e9\u00a0INVENT\u00e9 afin<\/strong>\u00a0de mettre en relief\u00a0de \u00ab\u00a0vraies<\/span>\u00a0\u00bb personnes comme MIRABEAU<\/span>,\u00a0CONDORCET, les \u00e9poux ROLAND<\/span> Ou m\u00eame ROBESPIERRE<\/strong>. IL paraissait plus CORRESPONDre \u00e0 une silhouette<\/span> en creux<\/strong>\u00a0R\u00c9V\u00c9LANT ces c\u00e9l\u00e9brit\u00e9s qu’\u00e0 une PERSONnALIT\u00e9 proprement dite<\/strong><\/span>, lit-on dans \u00ab\u00a0Radical CHIC\u00a0\u00bb, un article sign\u00e9 par NEAL ASCHERSON dans\u00a0THE LONDON REVIEW OF BOOKS<\/em><\/span><\/strong>\u2026 La biographie vive<\/span><\/strong>, RICHement D\u00e9TAILl\u00e9e, d\u00e9bordante d’anecdotes et de \u00a0noms propres<\/span> de CLAUDE ARNAUD<\/strong>\u00a0\"\"<\/a>\u00a0s’av\u00e8re \u00eatre une des plus INSTRUCTIVEs<\/span>\u00a0sur ce que l’on \u00e9prouve, durant des temps REVOLUTIONnaires<\/span>. Il montre comment la chaleur qu’ils d\u00e9gagent peut TRANSFORMer des PERSOnNALIT\u00e9S jusqu’\u00e0 les rendre<\/span> m\u00e9connaissABLEs<\/span><\/strong>. ceux qui gardent une CONSISTANCe<\/span>,<\/strong> m\u00eame au coeur de la fournaise, sont ceux<\/span> qui \u00e9taient d\u00e9j\u00e0 des\u00a0CAMELEONS sociaux<\/span> et des ma\u00eetres de l’IDENTIT\u00e9 multiple<\/span>.\u00a0le premier radical\u00a0CHIC fut CHAMFORT<\/span>.\u00a0\u00bb Pour lire in extenso cet article de N. AESCHERSON<\/span> DANS\u00a0THE\u00a0LONDON REVIEW OF BOOKS<\/strong><\/em>\u00a0(VOL. 14, N\u00b0 21, 5 NOV 1992)\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/h6>\n
*\u00ab La biographie de claude Arnaud<\/span><\/strong> est une introduction utile \u00e0 l’un des aphoristes qui m\u00e9ritent une place aux c\u00f4t\u00e9s de La Rochefoucauld<\/span><\/span><\/strong> et \u00e0 une figure historique \u00e0 qui<\/strong><\/span> Mirabeau<\/strong> a vol\u00e9 beaucoup de ses meilleures r\u00e9pliques\u00bb, \u00e9crit John RUICSHANK<\/span><\/strong> dans le Toronto Globe and Mail review of books<\/em><\/strong> du 11 juillet 1992.<\/h6>\n
*\u00ab Mr. Arnaud<\/strong><\/span> raconte la vie de Chamfort avec conviction<\/span><\/strong>. Il transcende sa mati\u00e8re \u00e0 travers un style<\/strong> ample, mi<\/span><\/strong> droitier,<\/span> mi th\u00e9orique<\/strong> (\u2026) aucune \u00e9tude ne serait \u00e0 m\u00eame de r\u00e9pondre \u00e0 toutes les questions que Chamfort<\/strong> soul\u00e8ve, mais au moins celle-ci nous d\u00e9livre-t-elle\u00a0 un portrait complet et suggestif <\/span><\/strong>(\u2026) \u2013 celle d’une figure contradictoire, d\u00e9chirante<\/span>, insaisissable, d\u00e9fiante<\/span>, enfantine, egotis<\/span>te, parfois d\u00e9lirante, parfois repoussante<\/span>, aussi admirable<\/span><\/strong> qu’excitante<\/strong>\u00bb, \u00e9crit W.S.MERVIN dans The New York Times Book Review<\/em><\/span><\/strong>, le 9.08.1992.\"\"<\/a><\/h6>\n
*\u00ab\u2026aussi plaisant qu’utile<\/span>, ce livre<\/strong> rapproche le lecteur d’un pays et d’une \u00e8re<\/strong> qui n’ont rien perdu de leur fascination<\/span><\/strong> (\u2026) il r\u00e9ussit m\u00eame\u00e0 \u00e9voquer brillemment<\/strong><\/span> les <\/strong>ultime d\u00e9cennies de l’ancien r\u00e9gime, et le d\u00e9roul\u00e9 aussi dramatique que color\u00e9 de la Revolution Fran\u00e7aise<\/strong><\/span>.\u00bb George MAY<\/strong>, The Yale Review<\/em><\/strong><\/span>, October 1992, n\u00b04.<\/h6>\n
*\u00a0\u00bbla biographie captivante<\/strong> de Claude Arnaud<\/span> fait de<\/strong> Chamfort<\/span> – le libertin<\/strong>, l’auteur dramatique<\/span>, le journaliste et le revolutionnaire aussi bien<\/span> – l’un des embl\u00eames les plus \u00e9loquents<\/span> de son temps<\/strong>\u00ab\u00a0, lit-on sur le site GOODREADS<\/em><\/strong>. d\u00e9couvrir l’\u00e9valutation des lecteurs<\/a>\u2026<\/h6>\n
*LE POINT de Vue du traducteur:<\/strong><\/h6>\n
\u00ab J’ai beaucoup aim\u00e9 le premier travail de traduction que j’ai effectu\u00e9<\/strong> – pour\u00a0 les presses universitaires de Chicago, il y a vint et quelques ann\u00e9es : la biographie, \u00e9crite par Claude Arnaud<\/span>,<\/strong> de Chamfort, le moraliste<\/strong> fran\u00e7ais du XVIII\u00b0 si\u00e8cle. J’\u00e9tais ravi d’avoir un contrat<\/span>, le texte lui-m\u00eame \u00e9tait elegament \u00e9crit<\/strong>, les traits d’esprit de Chamfort<\/span><\/strong> \u00e9taient un vrai d\u00e9fi pour un jeune traducteur, et Claude Arnaud m’encourageait et m’aida<\/span><\/strong>. Ce fut une experience tr\u00e8s gratifiante<\/span> qui m’a persuad\u00e9 de continuer dans cette voie.<\/strong> je reste tr\u00e8s fier de cette\u00a0 traduction quasi-parfaite<\/span>,<\/strong> m\u00eame si elle a \u00e9t\u00e9 fustig\u00e9e dans une grande revue litt\u00e9raire \u2014 une experience qui, aussi p\u00e9nible fut-elle<\/span><\/strong>, m’apprit \u00e0 voir au-del\u00e0\u00a0 de la surench\u00e8re un peu mesquine<\/strong> que suscite certaines traductions (beaucoup d’entre elles sont meilleures<\/span> que les critiques ne le pensent\u2014quand ils daignent y penser<\/span><\/strong>). <\/strong>Deke DUSINBERR<\/strong>E<\/strong>, 22\/08\/2013<\/strong>. pour lire l’int\u00e9gralit\u00e9 de ce commentaire\u2026<\/a><\/h6>\n
*Pour trouver cette traduction anglaise:\u00a0<\/span><\/strong> www.amazon.fr<\/a><\/h6>\n
En France : abebooks.fr<\/a><\/h6>\n
\u00a0<\/h6>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0(LA TRADUCTION EN FRAN\u00c7AIS DES ARTICLES SE trouve DANS LA SECONDE MOITI\u00c9 DE CETTE PAGE) \u00a0 *Translated by Deke Dusinberre, and published in 1992 by the University of Chicago Press, with a Foreword by Joseph Epstein, thE biography of CHAMFORT by CLAUDE ARNAUD was widely applauded, both in the USA and the UK. ISBN 0-226-02697-3. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":20,"menu_order":9,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-8881","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","count-0","even alt","author-claude-arnaud","last"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.claude-arnaud.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8881","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.claude-arnaud.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.claude-arnaud.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.claude-arnaud.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.claude-arnaud.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8881"}],"version-history":[{"count":38,"href":"https:\/\/www.claude-arnaud.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8881\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16191,"href":"https:\/\/www.claude-arnaud.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8881\/revisions\/16191"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.claude-arnaud.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/20"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.claude-arnaud.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8881"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}